Recently, Shi Fufu sent an open letter to the distributors of the national lighting industry, named the suspected infringing company, and published it in a newspaper, which attracted the protests of Wu Zhengyu and others in the industry; and on September 21, the United States The federal judge announced that the AUO Optoelectronics Company violated the anti-trust law case, ordered AUO to pay a fine of 500 million US dollars, and sentenced former AUO senior directors Chen Xuanbin and Xiong Hui to three years in prison, each fined 200,000 US dollars.
As a netizen commented, "I feel that LED is no longer just high-tech, it is a high-level legal issue." With the LED patent warfare, the legal issue will become more prominent in the LED industry in the future!
The original text of Wu Zhengyu is as follows:
Is Ford Optoelectronics a "Ford Court"? !
I saw an advertisement for "Open Letter from the Ford to the National Lighting Industry Dealer" published on a lighting media. The advertisements claim that the "unlawful enterprises" such as Enterprise I, Leike, Myers, Charm, etc. are infringing on their products, and are "seriously investigating them according to law".
Involving intellectual property infringement through legal channels is the power of every enterprise and citizen, but Shifu used advertisements in industry newspapers before the courts at all levels did not make a clear judgment, bluntly saying that some enterprises were “unlawful enterprises†and would The normal handling of litigation is claimed to be “seriously investigated and dealt with according to lawâ€. Shifu bought the layout with money and threatened the lighting industry dealers. As the courts in China are like their own government, the laws of China are like their own home laws! He said who is "infringement" and whoever infringes; whoever says "unlawful", whoever is illegal! If so, what else does the law and the court do? ! Directly changed Shi Ford Optoelectronics into "Stuart Court".
Shifu feels that others have infringed, and it is understandable that the legal solution is its power. No one can be wrong. If the company it claims is really infringing, it is also self-picked. However, before the formal law was arbitrarily, in the form of advertising, it was said that a certain enterprise was "unlawful", and it was "severely punished", so that the vast number of dealers were unclear, and the named enterprises were shamed. It is by no means a law-abiding, custodian enterprise, or an entrepreneur. If you are not angry, you can’t think of why!
As far as I know, Zhejiang Myles has filed a lawsuit against the company’s product infringement. According to the logic of Ford, whether Miles should also advertise that it is “illegal†and will “severely punish†It! !
In view of this, the individual only recognizes the banknotes of the above two media, loses the fair position of the news media, and expresses such unconstrained advertising behavior for the interests of a certain enterprise. It is deeply regrettable and contemptuous!
Micro perspective
@å´æ£å–†: Guan Shi Ford's advertisement, full of paper threatening words, just like the Cultural Revolution rhetoric! Reasonable is not high! What are you panic? What are you afraid of? No hurries? What is chaos?
According to the practice of Shifu, no matter who is dissatisfied in the future, he will go to the court to file a complaint, and then report to the reporter who is a criminal, has severely punished him! The world of China is not the world that can say who is illegal! Some media have received money and happiness, and immediately after the saddle, what is the style? ! What is the position? ! What is the heart? ! ! !
@锋言锋è¯- Tian Feng: Shifu is good at writing letters, and has sent many people to the mayor down to the mayor. This time it is a peer. For this reason, such speculation is not very clever. The role of Yue Leishi and Wu Wujiang’s self-restraint is so disregarding the food? !
@雷克照明-æŽåŽä¸½: Enterprises and brands should give more trust and trust to loyal consumers and loyal partners, rather than misleading and arbitrarily declaring war, so the final result is to flick the compatriots to go to the front line to die; "Japan's purchase of the island" today also bowed to take the initiative to meet with the Chinese side; Shi Ford treasure!
@隔隔丶å´äºŒäºŒ: Shi Ford, this is to take the opportunity to speculate yourself. . This kind of means is too low-level to pull, I believe that people with a clear eye can understand what is going on! ! ! Don't play big, turn over the boat. .
@Flip LED: I feel that LED is not a high-tech, it is a deep legal issue.
Attachment: Open letter from Shifu to dealers in the national lighting industry (see next page)
As a netizen commented, "I feel that LED is no longer just high-tech, it is a high-level legal issue." With the LED patent warfare, the legal issue will become more prominent in the LED industry in the future!
The original text of Wu Zhengyu is as follows:
Is Ford Optoelectronics a "Ford Court"? !
I saw an advertisement for "Open Letter from the Ford to the National Lighting Industry Dealer" published on a lighting media. The advertisements claim that the "unlawful enterprises" such as Enterprise I, Leike, Myers, Charm, etc. are infringing on their products, and are "seriously investigating them according to law".
Involving intellectual property infringement through legal channels is the power of every enterprise and citizen, but Shifu used advertisements in industry newspapers before the courts at all levels did not make a clear judgment, bluntly saying that some enterprises were “unlawful enterprises†and would The normal handling of litigation is claimed to be “seriously investigated and dealt with according to lawâ€. Shifu bought the layout with money and threatened the lighting industry dealers. As the courts in China are like their own government, the laws of China are like their own home laws! He said who is "infringement" and whoever infringes; whoever says "unlawful", whoever is illegal! If so, what else does the law and the court do? ! Directly changed Shi Ford Optoelectronics into "Stuart Court".
Shifu feels that others have infringed, and it is understandable that the legal solution is its power. No one can be wrong. If the company it claims is really infringing, it is also self-picked. However, before the formal law was arbitrarily, in the form of advertising, it was said that a certain enterprise was "unlawful", and it was "severely punished", so that the vast number of dealers were unclear, and the named enterprises were shamed. It is by no means a law-abiding, custodian enterprise, or an entrepreneur. If you are not angry, you can’t think of why!
As far as I know, Zhejiang Myles has filed a lawsuit against the company’s product infringement. According to the logic of Ford, whether Miles should also advertise that it is “illegal†and will “severely punish†It! !
In view of this, the individual only recognizes the banknotes of the above two media, loses the fair position of the news media, and expresses such unconstrained advertising behavior for the interests of a certain enterprise. It is deeply regrettable and contemptuous!
Micro perspective
@å´æ£å–†: Guan Shi Ford's advertisement, full of paper threatening words, just like the Cultural Revolution rhetoric! Reasonable is not high! What are you panic? What are you afraid of? No hurries? What is chaos?
According to the practice of Shifu, no matter who is dissatisfied in the future, he will go to the court to file a complaint, and then report to the reporter who is a criminal, has severely punished him! The world of China is not the world that can say who is illegal! Some media have received money and happiness, and immediately after the saddle, what is the style? ! What is the position? ! What is the heart? ! ! !
@锋言锋è¯- Tian Feng: Shifu is good at writing letters, and has sent many people to the mayor down to the mayor. This time it is a peer. For this reason, such speculation is not very clever. The role of Yue Leishi and Wu Wujiang’s self-restraint is so disregarding the food? !
@雷克照明-æŽåŽä¸½: Enterprises and brands should give more trust and trust to loyal consumers and loyal partners, rather than misleading and arbitrarily declaring war, so the final result is to flick the compatriots to go to the front line to die; "Japan's purchase of the island" today also bowed to take the initiative to meet with the Chinese side; Shi Ford treasure!
@隔隔丶å´äºŒäºŒ: Shi Ford, this is to take the opportunity to speculate yourself. . This kind of means is too low-level to pull, I believe that people with a clear eye can understand what is going on! ! ! Don't play big, turn over the boat. .
@Flip LED: I feel that LED is not a high-tech, it is a deep legal issue.
Attachment: Open letter from Shifu to dealers in the national lighting industry (see next page)
Floor Standing Display,Signage Advertising Display,Advertising Lcd Screen,Standing Digital Signage
ALLIN , https://www.nbdisplayapio.com